The regional table / Pennsylvania
Scrapple
A quart of corn meal, buckwheat flour to thicken it very thick, and it must be stirred constantly — the instruction has not changed since before the Civil War.
Scrapple is the best documented dish in Pennsylvania and it got that way by being unglamorous. The oldest full recipe reachable for this article is in Elizabeth E. Lea's Domestic Cookery, Useful Receipts, and Hints to Young Housekeepers, a Quaker housekeeping manual whose readable scan is the Baltimore printing of 1859 by Cushings and Bailey and whose text is the third revised edition. Her entry is nine lines long. Take eight pounds of scraps of pork, that will not do for sausage, boil it in four gallons of water, when tender, chop it fine, strain the liquor and pour it back into the pot, put in the meat, season it with sage, summer savory, salt and pepper to taste; stir in a quart of corn meal; after simmering a few minutes, thicken it with buckwheat flour very thick, it requires very little cooking after it is thickened, but must be stirred constantly. Everything a modern recipe adds to that is decoration. Twenty-one years later a Georgia weekly, the Newnan Herald of 2 March 1880, reprinted a receipt from the American Agriculturist for what is called scrapple, which is extensively used in Pennsylvania, furnished to that magazine by F. E. J. of Pennsylvania: boil head, liver, trimmings from hams and sholders, and skins from pieces intended for lard, until easily separated from the bones, then put them through the sausage cutter; into the strained liquor stir in eaqual quantities of Indian and buck wheat meal, sufficient to make mush, then the chopped meat with salt, pepper and sage; cook a few minutes, stirring constantly; pour into vessels to cool. Being more thorougly cooked than the usual way it keeps better. To serve it, it is sliced and fried. The typographical errors are the paper's. The two grains in equal measure, the liquor used as the cooking water, and the loaf cut cold and fried are all there, a hundred and forty-six years ago.
The absences are as loud as the recipes. Miss Leslie of Philadelphia published Directions for Cookery there in 1837 and the word scrapple does not occur in it once, nor in her Complete Cookery of 1853. Mrs. S. T. Rorer, principal of the Philadelphia Cooking School, wrote the Philadelphia Cook Book in 1886 — a manual of home economics for that city, with a chapter on every part of the pig — and the word appears in it zero times. So does it in The Pennsylvania German Cook Book of 1902, five hundred and sixty recipes compiled at Alliance, Ohio, from contributors writing in from Ohio and Indiana. Scrapple in the nineteenth century was farm and market food that cookbook authors did not think needed writing down, and the newspapers prove it was everywhere anyway: Wilmington's curb-stone markets selling butter, milk, eggs, sausages, scrapple, vegetables and poultry, all fresh from the farm, in a Howard Pyle sketch from Harper's reprinted in the Nebraska Advertiser of 13 January 1881; a Philadelphia five-cent lunch counter offering a plate of scrapple beside pepper pot in 1888; and, best of all, the Savannah Morning News of 24 March 1884 listing the stores for the Greely relief expedition and stopping to explain the word for its readers — boiled meat mixed with corn-meal and buckwheat flour is called scrapple, and 2,000 pounds of scrapple is to be taken, besides 2,000 pounds of pepper-pot, a kind of soup. A Georgia paper the day before called the same two thousand pounds Philadelphia scrapple. The federal government finally wrote a definition of its own in 1970, and it is at 9 CFR 319.280: scrapple shall contain not less than 40 percent meat and/or meat byproducts computed on the basis of the fresh weight, exclusive of bone, and the meal or flour used may be derived from grain and/or soybeans. One caution about the folklore. This dish is always credited to the Pennsylvania Dutch kitchen and that is very likely right, but the German name usually printed alongside it could not be verified in any document opened here — under five spellings it appears nowhere in Lea, in either Leslie, in Rorer, in the 1902 Pennsylvania German book or in a 1915 Bucks County recipe collection. It may well be sound; this article simply cannot vouch for it.
Why this version works
Two grains, not one. Cornmeal alone sets grainy and sandy; buckwheat alone sets gluey and tastes of nothing else. Both nineteenth-century sources use the pair, the 1880 one in equal quantities, and the division of labour is real: the corn gives the sweetness and the crust, the buckwheat gives the bind and the dark savoury note that makes the slice taste older than it is. Buckwheat also has no gluten, so it thickens without turning elastic.
Overnight in the mould is a cooking step. The loaf is not merely cooling, it is setting. Warm scrapple will not hold a slice and will fall to porridge in the pan; twelve hours cold lets the starch retrograde and the gelatin firm, and that is the difference between a slice that crusts and a slice that spreads itself across the skillet.
The broth is the liquid, and there is no other. Lea strains the liquor and pours it back into the pot before the meal goes in; the 1880 version stirs the meal straight into the water the meat came out of, with the small bones strained away. That is the whole flavour mechanism. A scrapple built on water or stock from a carton tastes of cornmeal and sage. One built on four gallons of pork liquor reduced with the meat still in it tastes of pork all the way through, because the gelatin that came out of the skin and bone is what sets the loaf as much as the starch does.
It has to be stirred constantly, and both sources say so. Once the meal is in, the pot is a starch slurry over direct heat, and starch on the bottom of a pot scorches in seconds and taints eight pounds of meat with it. Lea's line is that it requires very little cooking after it is thickened, but must be stirred constantly; the 1880 one says cook a few minutes, stirring it constantly. Neither is being fussy.