The regional table / Connecticut
Connecticut Hot Lobster Roll with Butter
A Connecticut restaurant menu of August 1962 prints it as one item in a take-out list, hyphenated and priced: HOT-LOBSTER ROLL 85c.
That menu is the anchor, and it is worth quoting in its setting. The Branford Review of 16 August 1962 carries an advertisement for Deacon's Restaurant, 225 Montowese Street, "Serving Quality Foods at Minimum Prices". Under the heading Thursday & Friday Take-Out Specials it lists New England clam chowder at 50c a pint, fried Ipswich clams at 75c a pint, a soft shell crab sandwich at 95c, french fries at 20c, and then HOT-LOBSTER ROLL 85c. Hot is printed into the name, hyphenated onto it, on a Long Island Sound shore-town menu, as a normal item priced between the fries and the dinners. The word reaches Connecticut print earlier than that, though without the adjective: the Stonington Mirror and Mystic Journal of 26 June 1942 ran an advertisement for the Rogers, Bindloss dock asking readers whether they had "tried our fresh lobster roll?" and telling them "Better do it." That is a lobster roll sold at a working dock on the Connecticut shore in the first summer of the war, and the copy describes it as fresh and nothing else.
The split that everybody states as settled — Connecticut hot with butter, Maine cold with mayonnaise — does not appear in the earliest dated printings on either side, and this article will not pretend otherwise, particularly since Maine's roll has not been written here yet and deserves its own documents rather than being used as a foil. What the Maine record actually says at the same moment is this: the Biddeford Daily Journal ran a small advertisement through the summer of 1944 reading "TOASTED, LOBSTER Roll 20c. Inquire Fournier's Grill, 185 Pool St.", and the same grill's display advertisement of 23 February 1943 lists Lobster Roll among live lobsters, freshly shucked clams and clams for steaming. Toasted, twenty cents, and silent about dressing. So in the 1940s both states are selling something called a lobster roll and neither one is telling the reader what is in it. What is dated is the adjective: toasted in Maine in 1944, hot in Connecticut in 1962. The rest of the argument for butter is the lobster itself, and the federal record is good on that. The Fisheries and Fishery Industries of the United States, Government Printing Office, 1887, says Connecticut's lobster interests "date back to the early part of the present century, and certainly to before 1810", that the fishery inside state waters was never very extensive, and that the long-running lobster trade between Cape Cod and New York City "was largely due to their enterprise" — Connecticut smacks, out of Noank and New London, carrying other people's lobsters to somebody else's market. The same volume prints the size laws side by side, and they are not close: Connecticut's law of 1878 prohibited taking lobsters under six inches, while Rhode Island in 1882 set ten and New York in 1880 set ten and a half. A state whose legal lobster was six inches long was a state in which the meat came in small, sweet pieces from soft-shell lobsters, and a small sweet piece of lobster does not want to be buried in mayonnaise.
Why this version works
Nothing else in the bun. No celery, no onion, no herbs beyond a pinch of chives if you must, and above all no mayonnaise alongside the butter. The single argument of this sandwich is that a good lobster tastes better warm than cold and that butter carries that flavour where mayonnaise covers it. Adding both makes the case for neither.
Butter off the heat, not butter in a pan. Lobster meat is already cooked when it is picked, and the second cooking is what makes it squeak against the teeth. Melt the butter, pull the pan off the burner, let it drop below a simmer, and then turn the meat through it for a minute or two. You are warming it to about the temperature of a bath, not cooking it again.
A split-top bun, because the sides are the plate. A New England split-top roll is crustless on both flat sides, which means both sides can be buttered and griddled to a crisp golden wall. That wall is structural: it is what stops a bun holding four ounces of buttered lobster from collapsing into the paper. A side-split hamburger or hot dog bun has crust where you need griddle, and it goes limp.
Claw and knuckle for the body of it, tail for the bite. Claw and knuckle meat is looser, sweeter and more absorbent; tail is firm and holds its shape. A roll of pure tail eats like a rubber sandwich and a roll of pure claw eats like a paste. Roughly two thirds claw and knuckle to one third tail, cut in large pieces, gives you both textures in one mouthful.